So yesterday I was celebrating the fact that No Holding Back was being reissued in the Harlequin Treasury ... Celebrating because this is a book that is 16+ years old and has come round again for readers to get a chance to read it.And today I discover that in an article in the Telegraph the cover of this book - this sixteen year old book is being used to illustrate an article about the reasons why Mills & Boon books are 'bad' for women because they cause marital breakdown . Can I say same old same old?
And in the case of the Violet Winspear book also used to illustrate this accurate and up to date article - not! - the poor lady died in 1989 - and the book illustrated came out in 1961!
Can I just say those couple of little words over again - accurate and up to date?
And as for the fat that we romance writers never ever include the use of a condom in our love scenes . . .yawn! Probably not in 1961 but as I just wrote a love scene where the heroine had the condoms with her in her handbag . .. get some accurate information journalists!
Still, it was nice to see my elderly book get a showing
